[389-users] 389 directory server crash

[Rich Megginson]

On 11/14/2013 08:50 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
> One of the consumers has crashed again and I have attached the stacktrace.
> Four hous later it crashed again.
>
> I do hope there is something in the stacktraces, so that something can 
> be done to prevent future crashes.

Unfortunately, not enough.  Looks like there is still some mismatch 
between the version of the package and the version of the debuginfo package.

rpm -q 389-ds-base 389-ds-base-debuginfo openldap openldap-debuginfo db4 
db4-debuginfo nss nss-debuginfo nspr nspr-debuginfo glibc glibc-debuginfo

Also, if you are seeing the message:
ber_flush skipped because the connection was marked to be closed or 
abandoned

This means you are running with the CONNS error log level, which means 
you may have a lot of useful information in your errors log. Would you 
be able to provide that?

>
> The last log message in errors log was both times:
> ber_flush skipped because the connection was marked to be closed or 
> abandoned
>
> The following versions 389ds packages were installed at the time:
> 389-admin-1.1.29-1.el6.x86_64
> 389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch
> 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch
> 389-adminutil-1.1.15-1.el6.x86_64
> 389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch
> 389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch
> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-22.el6_4.x86_64
> 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-22.el6_4.x86_64
> 389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch
> 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch
> 389-dsgw-1.1.10-1.el6.x86_64
>
> Reragds, Mitja
>
>
> On 17. 07. 2013 09:52, Mitja Mihelič wrote:
>>
>>
>> It may be best if I removed all 389DS related data from both of the 
>> consumer servers and start fresh. If they crash again I will send the 
>> relevant stack traces.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20131114/f74d96a8/attachment.html>