[389-users] 1.2.11.30 ETA?

Timothy Pollard timp at timp.com.au
Thu Jul 3 23:13:19 UTC 2014


On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:10:01 -0600
Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/03/2014 03:58 PM, Timothy Pollard wrote:
> > We're actually on CentOS 6. We'd be happy to use the standard distro
> > version, but we're seeing a lot of crashes (about half a dozen or so a day;
> > we've got Puppet set up to check every five minutes and restart if it's
> > down). We're not absolutely sure that our problems are caused by the bugs
> > fixed in 1.2.11.30, but we want to try rolling out the fixes as soon as
> > possible to see if it alleviates the problems.
> 
> Would you be willing to build from source?

We're willing to consider it, though we'd rather avoid it.
> 
> >>> I'm specifically asking because we have been seeing a lot of crashes on
> >>> our LDAP system. The coredumps we sent through resulted in some tickets
> >>> that have been fixed as part of 1.2.11.30, so we're hoping that the
> >>> upgrade would make our systems more stable.
> >> Which tickets are these?
> > https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47696 is the ticket I reported, but
> > nhosoi created https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47750 as a related
> > ticket, and https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47764 seems to be affecting
> > us as well.
> 
> Looks like these are due for RHEL 6.6 . . .

Hmm, OK, looks like some of them will be in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-34.el6, and
we're on 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-33.el6_5, so I'm guessing that it's not far off?

Thanks,
-- 
TimP
[http://hub.timp.com.au]
[http://blog.timp.com.au]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20140704/5a57fd2c/attachment.sig>


More information about the 389-users mailing list