[389-users] Yum Update vs Yum Upgrade

[David Barr]

Good Morning,

“yum upgrade” === “yum update --obsoletes”

where the “—obsoletes” flag says to remove packages that have been made obsolete by the upgrade (say you’re upgrading from 5.9 to 6.5).

Cheers!
David

On May 20, 2014, at 10:00, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 05/20/2014 10:58 AM, Fong, Trevor wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>  
>> After taking over the LDAP service from a colleague, I updated the 389 DS service to the latest release by issuing a “yum update …”.  Then when searching around the 389-ds documentation, I came across the install page that said that I must use “yum upgrade …” and not update. 
>>  
>> My question is what’s the difference between yum update and upgrade?
> 
> I think they are the same.  If someone knows any difference between "yum update" and "yum upgrade" I'd like to hear it.
> 
>> Is it OK if I leave it like that or should I do the yum upgrade?
> 
> It is OK to leave it like that.
> 
>> The service seems to be running OK after “yum update”, so far.
>>  
>> I went from 1.2.11.15-14.el6_4 --> 1.2.11.29-1.el6
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Trev
>>  
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> Trevor Fong – Senior Programmer Analyst
>> Identity and Access Management Group
>> University of British Columbia – Information Technology
>> 6356 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada
>> Ph: (604) 827-5247
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> 
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--

David - Offbeat		http://dafydd.livejournal.com
dafydd - Online		http://pgp.mit.edu/
Battalion 4 - Black Rock City Emergency Services Department
	Integrity*Commitment*Communication*Support

----5----1----5----2----5----3----5----4----5----5----5----6----5----7--

Pavlov walks into a bar. The phone rings and he says,

"Damn! I forgot to feed the dog!"



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20140520/ea98aff1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20140520/ea98aff1/attachment.sig>