[389-users] winsyncsubtreepair

[Rich Megginson]

On 07/07/2015 05:35 PM, Mark Boyce wrote:
>
> Rich,
>
> I am able to get the core dump and it appears to be a segmentation 
> fault when modifying the replication agreement… anything specific from 
> the dump that would be helpful?
>

Not sure.  Can you provide the full stack trace?  Be sure to 
obscure/remove any sensitive information first.  If you don't feel 
comfortable about that, just email me the stack trace.

> Thanks,
>
> m.
>
> *Mark L. Boyce*
>
> Senior Identity Management Analyst
>
> University of California, Office of the President
>
> *From:*389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org 
> [mailto:389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Rich 
> Megginson
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:59 AM
> *To:* 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> *Subject:* Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair
>
> On 07/07/2015 11:49 AM, Mark Boyce wrote:
>
>     Rich,
>
>     The version of 389-ds-base is 1.3.3.10-1.fc22.x89-64 and it’s the
>     same behavior running the agreement against AD 2003 or AD 2012.
>
>     By “two pairs” in mean to indicate that I have two winsyncsubtree
>     pair attributes; i.e
>     ou=people,dc=example,dc=org:cn=Users,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org and
>     ou=people,dc=example,dc=org:ou=administrators,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org
>
>     I can either modify the sync agreement using ldapmodify or from
>     the GUI with “Initialize Full Re-synchronization” and as soon as I
>     hit enter after adding another winsyncsubtreepair value the server
>     can’t be contacted and must be restarted.
>
>
> That sounds like a crash - 
> http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#debugging-crashes
>
>
> By “in-scope”, I mean to say that I cannot use a single windows 
> subtree in the agreement; i.e. cn=Users,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org.
>
> Does that add clarity?
>
> *Mark L. Boyce*
>
> Senior Identity Management Analyst
>
> University of California, Office of the President
>
> *From:*389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org 
> <mailto:389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org> 
> [mailto:389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Rich 
> Megginson
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 07, 2015 9:22 AM
> *To:* 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org 
> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair
>
> On 07/07/2015 10:07 AM, Mark Boyce wrote:
>
>     Good Morning,
>
>     Has anyone else seen this behavior; after configuring Winsync I
>     add one or perhaps two “pairs” to the sync agreement (ds:AD)
>
>
> Firstly - what version of 389-ds-base?  rpm -q 389-ds-base
> What version of Windows/AD?  2012 R2?
>
> I don't know what you mean by 'two "pairs"'.
>
>
>
> and run a full sync successfully.  Upon subsequent attempt to add 
> another pair the dirsrv abends (nothing in the logs)
>
>
> What commands are you running?  How do you know the dirsrv abends?  
> That is, if there is nothing in the logs, what commands are you 
> running to see the failure?
>
>
>
> and the modify operation fails (either via CLI or GUI).  This is 
> critical to our org as the AD structure doesn’t lend it’s self to a 
> single “in-scope” OU…
>
>
> Also not sure what you mean by "single in-scope OU".
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> m.
>
> *Mark L. Boyce*
>
> Senior Identity Management Analyst
>
> University of California, Office of the President
>
> 415 20^th Street
>
> Oakland, CA 94612
>
> Office: 510.987.9681
>
> Cell: 209.851.0196
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org  <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org  <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20150707/f1d7c2f3/attachment.html>