[389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

[Rich Megginson]

On 03/10/2015 10:57 AM, Robert Viduya wrote:
> Ok, I'll look into upgrading.  It sounds like I need to stop paying 
> attention to the 389 website and just stick to Redhat's site for 
> release information.

If you are a RHEL customer and you are using the 389-ds-base that is 
provided by RHEL, then yes, for changes to the core 389-ds-base package.

>
> On Mar 9, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com 
> <mailto:rmeggins at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi at redhat.com 
>>>>> <mailto:nhosoi at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
>>>>>> I'm in the same boat.  We, as an enterprise, have standardized on 
>>>>>> RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon.  Switching to 
>>>>>> either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option.  But the only "official" 
>>>>>> 389 release for RHEL6 is years old.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 
>>>>>> 1.2.11.26.  But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6.  So, yes, 
>>>>>> there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. 
>>>>>>  But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have 
>>>>>> come out since then.  The longer we're held back, the harder it 
>>>>>> will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features 
>>>>>> once we do upgrade.
>>>>> The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 
>>>>> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 
>>>>> 2014 for RHEL-6.6.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry about missing the announcement.  Could it be possible to 
>>>>> upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the 
>>>> base 1.2.11.15 release.  Is that detailed somewhere?  Yes, I can 
>>>> upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to know what’s 
>>>> changed.
>>>
>>> As a RHEL customer, you have access to the portal, so you can go to 
>>> https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/rhel---6/x86_64/168/389-ds-base/1.2.11.15-50.el6_6/x86_64/fd431d51/package 
>>> and look at the changelog for the 389-ds-base package. This has 
>>> descriptions of the changes along with bugzilla bug number and 
>>> sometimes 389 trac ticket numbers.
>>>
>>> There's probably some way to get a list of all errata for the 
>>> 389-ds-base package in RHEL6, but I can't seem to find it.
>>
>> Found it.  Unfortunately, it is not broken down by package.  But if 
>> you go to this page and search for 389-ds-base you can find them.  
>> The erratas have the full documentation, bug/enhancement 
>> descriptions, and package versions. 
>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html
>>
>> For example, here is the latest errata released on March 5, 2015: 
>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0628.html
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 389 users mailing list
>>>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> 389 users mailing list
>>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org 
>> <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20150310/3189b0d9/attachment.html>