[389-users] Limit on number of databases per directory server instance

[Mark Reynolds]

On 05/19/2015 04:10 PM, Colin Tulloch wrote:
>
> Hi Mark –
>
> Let me clarify.  These databases would be used in multi-master 
> replication.  Is there any limit to the number of databases configured 
> for MMR on an instance/server ?
>
Nope, there is no hard coded limit.  Your only limit is the resources 
available on the system (disk space, CPU, memory)
>
> *From:*389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org 
> [mailto:389-users-bounces at lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark 
> Reynolds
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 19, 2015 2:31 PM
> *To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> *Subject:* Re: [389-users] Limit on number of databases per directory 
> server instance
>
> On 05/19/2015 02:25 PM, Colin Tulloch wrote:
>
>     Hi all –
>
>     Is there a limit to the number of databases that can be present on
>     an instance of directory server – or on a server/VM itself?
>
>     Some colleagues of mine seem to believe there is a limit of 10 DBs
>     per server.  I haven’t seen this in the Redhat documentation
>     myself (we run RHDS, not necessarily 389).
>
> Hi Colin,
>
> There is no limit on backend databases in the Directory Server.
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
>     *Colin Tulloch*
>
>     *Cloud Services Architect*
>     Office –**
>
>     Cell  – **
>
>     *colin.tulloch at entrust.com <mailto:colin.tulloch at entrust.com>*
>
>
>
>
>     --
>
>     389 users mailing list
>
>     389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org  <mailto:389-users at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>
>     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20150519/436cfdf8/attachment.html>