arch-dependent files in -dev packages

[Björn Persson]

Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> Björn Persson wrote:
> > Bindir
> 
> Bin_Dir?  Just to follow Ada identifier style a bit.
> 
> > Libexecdir
> 
> Lib_Exec_Dir?  (As above.)

As I see it, either we use the GNU standard variable names or we don't.
If we don't, then I would prefer "Executables_Directory" over
"Bin_Dir". I see no point in making up names that are almost but not
quite like the GNU standard ones.

The GNU standard names are widespread and well-known. Many system
administrators and packagers will understand them immediately. They're
also already in use in Comfignat and Fedora, and I don't know of any
compelling reason to change them.

Björn Persson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ada/attachments/20130912/08d44ff6/attachment.sig>