[fab] project hosting?

[Colin Bodell]

Understood. I would hope the cost factor would somewhat mitigate this 
position ;-)
Who makes the final call on this?

Col

Jesse Keating wrote:

>On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 12:34 -0700, Colin Bodell wrote:
>  
>
>>Why should it be avoided? SourceForge.net is not open source yet 
>>delivers a tremendous service to the community.
>>We should focus on capability and community value. You get a no cost, 
>>turnkey, hosted system with  admin, backup network that you
>>can configure the meet the needs of the Fedora community etc. That's
>>not 
>>a bad deal in my book. Compare SourceForge Enterprise
>>against, say, Savannah (except there is not much of a comparison).
>>I'd 
>>be happy to admin it for the community too :-) 
>>    
>>
>
>Because of Fedora's goals of being once open, always open.  Anything
>Fedora should be built up from OpenSource software.  This includes the
>software that Red Hat users to put it together, there is something of a
>push to open that software too.  (note that I'm speaking as a person,
>NOT RED HAT)  Using proprietary software to facilitate the project is a
>nonstarter IMHO.
>
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>fedora-advisory-board mailing list
>fedora-advisory-board at redhat.com
>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
>  
>