[fab] JBJ considered harmfull
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Aug 8 14:26:50 UTC 2006
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 10:12, Max Spevack wrote:
> I was hoping it would be done by now, and that it wouldn't be a long wait.
> The purpose of what Bill and Will were talking about doing was stopping
> non-Fedora maintainers or QA folks, basically, from closing Fedora bugs,
> which is a major problem with what JBJ is doing.
This doesn't prevent him from leaving abusive comments in our bug reports.
This is IMHO the bigger issue. Do we have a method for removing abusive
folks from bugzilla? If I were to go start dropping f-bombs on random bugs,
how quickly would my account get disabled? Why is jbj any different?
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20060808/8c8f9aef/attachment.bin
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list