[fab] New project formation is out of control

[Paul W. Frields]

On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 17:50 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> I wouldn't have SIGs report necessarily to any Project.  If an existing
> project chooses to kick out a new SIG, fine.  If someone wants to align a
> SIG to a Project, fine.  But if a SIG wants to sprout in the desert, doing
> their own work in a little corner of the wiki, then that should be fine,
> too.

OK, I'll buy that for $0.02.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20060808/d1ac4a45/attachment.bin