fedora 7 schedule (was Re: Fedora 7 planing)

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:44, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> Sounds fine to me.  But just make sure it's "I don't have the bandwith
> to do this, you're going to have to help me" not "Xen sucks, get it
> out."  Xen _might_ suck because it's not upstream, but I don't think
> that's the problem we're really dealing with here.  Just a guess, though.

Its more of a 'xen upstream doesn't care about newer kernels nor Fedora, so we 
have to do all the work ourselves, and um -ENOTIME'  However if the xen stuff 
were in upstream kernel, there is a much higher chance it would be working 
before the upstream kernel made upstream releases and then we wouldn't have 
this problem.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20061213/9b955ac5/attachment.bin