fedora 7 schedule (was Re: Fedora 7 planing)
Dave Jones
davej at redhat.com
Wed Dec 13 22:14:08 UTC 2006
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:07:47PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:44, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> > Sounds fine to me. But just make sure it's "I don't have the bandwith
> > to do this, you're going to have to help me" not "Xen sucks, get it
> > out." Xen _might_ suck because it's not upstream, but I don't think
> > that's the problem we're really dealing with here. Just a guess, though.
>
> Its more of a 'xen upstream doesn't care about newer kernels nor Fedora, so we
> have to do all the work ourselves, and um -ENOTIME' However if the xen stuff
> were in upstream kernel, there is a much higher chance it would be working
> before the upstream kernel made upstream releases and then we wouldn't have
> this problem.
Right. It's a bottleneck. I'm prevented from rebasing until the Xen team
has found the cycles to bring the necessary bits up to speed.
When this happens basically I have to go find something else to do.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list