fedora 7 schedule (was Re: Fedora 7 planing)

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 12/13/06, Christopher Blizzard <blizzard at redhat.com> wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:22:03PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >  > On Wednesday 13 December 2006 17:06, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >  > > Basically, if you want Xen, you get Xen. kmods not included.
> >  > >
> >  > > I mean, it's not like we really keep kmods up to date for rawhide
> >  > > anyway.
> >  >
> >  > And what about released products?  How often are the gfs1 kmods actually not
> >  > broken in FC5?  Once per month, if that?
> >
> > The difference is, kernel-xen actually has users.
> > I don't think anyone seriously cares about GFS1.
> >
> >  > Perhaps I'm not seeing what is being proposed.  The xen kernel can't languish
> >  > because if we rebase the kernel, we may have to rebase userland beyond what
> >  > an old kernel can handle.  Boom there goes Xen.
> >
> > Good point. I don't have an answer for this.
> >
> >               Dave
> >
>
> Once again, I think that's up to the Virt team inside of Red Hat to own.
>   And it's not like that's going to happen in a vacuum.  You're going to
> talk to the virt team before you rebase something, right?  This isn't
> supposed to be them following us without them knowing where we're going.
>   We're going to make this a conversation, right?
>

It would be nice to see someone from the Virt team answering on a FAB
conversation. If they answer on fedora-devel ones I don't know..
because I don't know anyone on the virt team.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"