[fab] Proposed Project: Fedora Testing
Greg DeKoenigsberg
gdk at redhat.com
Wed Jul 12 21:26:48 UTC 2006
Sorry guys, catching up on mail, but I did have one comment here:
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > 4. What does it mean to be a formal Fedora Project project, beyond the
> > name? That is, is someone restricted from using the Wiki for the
> > project until then? How about CVS? Plone?
>
> This is one of the recurring questions in my mind. And I don't have an
> obvious answer to it.
Yeah, I don't think the answer *is* obvious, but I think the answer is
important.
To me, the answer is *an identified leadership structure that makes
things happen*. My take: any Fedora undertaking that is mature enough to
(a) develop a critical mass of people who *do* something instead of
talking about something, and (b) easily integrate other people who want to
help by handing them useful actions to perform... is mature enough to be
called a Fedora project.
Really, it's a project when the *participants* decide it's a project...
not when *we* decide it's a project. The board should be encouraging
those "incubator projects" to *take action*, and should reward those that
*do* take action by giving them "official project status".
My $0.02.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list