[fab] Legal contact policy and incentives for contributors

[Rahul]

Max Spevack wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, seth vidal wrote:
> 
>>> For legal issues, we have had Greg Dek acting as our counsel gateway 
>>> for a while now. Considering the number of issues that popup (package 
>>> license approvals, patent concerns, logo, trademark & brand 
>>> guidelines etc etc), having a single person acting as a gateway might 
>>> not be the best approach here and since the primary Red Hat counsel 
>>> is already in this list, we might consider sending a mail to this 
>>> list for addressing their legal concerns regarding Fedora for issues 
>>> that can be address in a public list and let Greg Dek handle anything 
>>> more sensitive off list. If we have consensus, lets make this our new 
>>> policy.
>>
>> Umm - Is Greg on board with this? :)
> 
> In reality, it should s/Greg/Max with regard to Fedora legal issues.  
> And I'm on board with it.
> 

So would you prefer any legal issues including license approval for 
packages in Fedora Extras send to this list or to you directly.

http://fedora.redhat.com/About/contact.html lists Greg Dek as the legal 
contact still.

Patrick, can we copy all such pages (leaving out the formally published 
documentation under /docs for now) over to the wiki and setup up 
redirects? Shouldnt be more than a dozen pages now.

Rahul