[fab] Re: [Famsco-list] New project formation is out of control

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 08:38 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> RHM is a vehicle for that input as well as offering a "feedback input"
> from the readership.  RHM periodically allows readers to respond with
> data on how much they benefited from an article, whereas this "new"
> interview initiative does not seem to have any such mechanism.

BTW, I understand that RHM is improving the feedback mechanism.  For
example, my last article and the one in the coming issue have forum
threads for discussion in my Articles forum (on quaid.108).  This thread
is now linked from the bottom of the article.

Anyway, I would love to see a greater role for FDP in peer review, such
as editing Fedora Interviews.  Figuring out how to get FDP in the review
loop is a good thing for us to discuss about a new project before it
gets entirely out in the wild. :)

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20060610/e38f221a/attachment.bin