[fab] Succession Planning

[Patrick W. Barnes]

On Tuesday 20 June 2006 18:35, "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Definitely post-FC6, preferably post-FC7. The current board IMO needs to
> > provide a strong path to lead forward.
>
> The "post-" is an important distinction.  I would word it "within 30
> days after," which sets a deadline with enough time for decompression,
> back-patting, and lessons learned post-release.  Longer than that, and
> it's getting too close to the release of FC(n+1)test1.

I'm inclined to agree on both points.  I think our current board is solid and 
needs time to work its magic.  I say we target 30 days after the release of 
FC7.  We don't need to break out the guillotine just yet.  ;-)

-- 
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64 at n-man.com

http://www.n-man.com/

LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64

Have I been helpful?  Rate my assistance!
http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
-- 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20060621/5a5e911e/attachment.bin