[fab] Fedora Logo versus OPL License

[Mark Webbink]

Sorry to be late to this party.  I can confirm that Rahul is correct. 
The FEDORA mark, as well as the Fedora Logo, are trademarks, and those
marks are owned by Red Hat.  They are to be applied only to the original
content and software released by the Fedora Project and not to modified
versions of those.  The Fedora Trademark Guidelines, found here
http://fedora.redhat.com/about/trademarks/guidelines/, apply equally to
documentation.

Mark

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

>On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 08:48 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
>  
>
>>On 5/23/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>You are wrong. The logo or artwork is not licensed under OPL.
>>>
>>>Rahul
>>>      
>>>
>>But since the Fedora Logo is now part of the contents of the wiki. It
>>may be considered as OPL ?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>It doesnt work that way. Just because you upload something into the wiki
>doesnt mean that it is licensed under OPL. You are free to upload a GPL
>licensed artwork such BlueCurve into the wiki for example. 
>
>Rahul
>
>_______________________________________________
>fedora-advisory-board mailing list
>fedora-advisory-board at redhat.com
>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20060621/dc856c29/attachment.html