[fab] FSF Requirements for srpm provisions

[Patrick W. Barnes]

On Thursday 02 November 2006 15:50, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> As long as the SRPMs remain available.  If the respin involves packages
> where we don't keep the RPMS/SRPMS for the life of the ISO respin then
> we'd be in trouble.
>
> I know this would cause trouble for things from FC-devel.  I think it
> would be a problem for FC-updates and FE as well.
>

Don't forget CVS.  It's just as valid as a source provider as the SRPMS.

-- 
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64 at n-man.com

http://n-man.com/

LinkedIn:
http://linkedin.com/in/nman64

Have I been helpful?  Rate my assistance!
http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
-- 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20061102/72255ef3/attachment.bin