[fab] build service

[seth vidal]

On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 16:48 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:49:16 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> > Thus I'm more and more
> > wondering if we we should re-evaluate the "Fedora Alternatives" idea
> > that got buried. Users of stable releases that want a bit more up2date
> > stuff could get in there, while users that are a careful stick to the
> > main distro, and users that like some risks use devel.
> > 
> > But we have some much on our plate currently, thus I don't think it'll
> > be wise to discuss that now.
> 
> So?
> 
> Rest assured, it would be wise. Much wiser than the current crap in FE,
> where we have packages which conflict with other packages in Core or
> Extras _explicitly_.
> 

FE has packages explicitly conflicting with pkgs in core? I thought that
was against the rules?

-sv