[fab] Architecture Policy.
jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Thu Nov 16 22:10:34 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:57 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 16 November 2006 16:48, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Jesse Keating (jkeating at redhat.com) said:
> > > Sure, but how can you tell? How can you tell what somebody might have
> > > done to get from point A) source rpms to point B) binary rpms wrapped up
> > > in an iso?
> > So, you'd ship a system that doesn't use the bits you use to build
> > it? Why would someone go to that much effort?
> I don't know, but I just think a blanket "built from Fedora sources can be
> Fedora" is a bit too far reaching. "Built from Fedora sources by Fedora
> tools" seems a bit safer to me, but still should get board approval to use
> the logo/trademark.
How do you conclusively prove that? You'd have to keep mock build logs
for every binary in that release for people to look at.
More information about the advisory-board