[Fedora Project Wiki] Update of "Infrastructure/ProjectHosting" by BillNottingham
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Nov 21 16:05:28 UTC 2006
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 10:53, you wrote:
> + * Issue tracking (is bz OK?)
So the reason I don't think bz is OK is that if we continue to use our BZ for
new projects the Product list will get quite large quite fast. Users trying
to use bugzilla.redhat.com to file bugs against say Fedora or RHEL will be
hit with a very large product list to choose from, and even more confusing if
they're filing a bug against a package that exists in one of these products,
but the package's upstream bugs are hosted on our bugzilla, the bug may get
filed upstream but we'd never know "downstream" about it.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20061121/140a6422/attachment.bin
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list