[fab] Metrics: What we *could* get

[Christopher Blizzard]

seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 12:35 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
>> Just a point here.  It's important to point out that we're interested in 
>> something that's a good guess.  Not something that's perfect.  We'll 
>> never build a perfect system, but that doesn't mean that we should avoid 
>> building something that's decent.
> 
> heh, from what people have described so far here they don't even want
> perfect. They want something that tells them what they want to hear.
> 
> I can write that:
>  print "100000000 downloaded fc6"

I, for one, am interested in better numbers.  I'm not looking for an 
outcome.  But right now what I have is just based on innuendo and wild 
ass guessing.  I'd be happy if I could just get to guessing without all 
the wild asses.  As fun as that sounds.

--Chris