[fab] Fedora Project and Hosting

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:20 -0400, seth vidal wrote:

> I won't say use 108 b/c:
> 1. 108 is not open source

s/108/SourceForge/

And unlike SF, the people behind 108 (me, Red Hat, etc.) are in favor of
a 100% FLOSS solution.  We just couldn't find one for the
time-to-market.  Also nice to have a managed hosting provider, with that
same time-to-market.

At the rate that Fedora is progressing with this, 108 could get there
first. :)

> 2. 108 is not a fedora project at all

s/108/SourceForge/
s/108/Google hosting/
...

> 3. 108 requires YET ANOTHER ACCOUNT.

s/108/SourceForge/

Not if you already have a redhat.com account, which many people either
have already or will want.

-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20061020/9d5f9772/attachment.bin