RFC: Release team meetings

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Apr 13 13:04:00 UTC 2007


On Friday 13 April 2007 01:05:05 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> I'd further would like to see more informations what the Release Team is
> (number of people and names), how it is constituted (approved, elected,
> mixed?), who's responsible (chairmen?) and what its works areas exactly
> are (what remains FESCo work and what will the Release Team take care
> of? and when does the Board get into the game?).

It's things like this that start to frustrate me.  Sure it's neat information 
to have, but for the sake of getting a few people together to get some work 
done, I really don't want to have to go through the headache of creating all 
this red tape and governance.  Now, I don't think that some of this is bad to 
have, it just makes the barrier of entry to having a group of people work on 
something pretty daunting.  It's part of the reason why I _haven't_ yet 
created the sig page for the release team, thinking about this crud gives me 
a headache.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20070413/9eefcfec/attachment.bin 


More information about the advisory-board mailing list