RFC: Release team meetings

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Bill Nottingham schrieb:
> Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora at leemhuis.info) said: 
>>> == Composition ==
>>>  * Jesse Keating (f13)
>>>  * Josh Boyer (jwb)
>>>  * Bill Nottingham (notting)
>>>  * Jeremy Katz (katzj)
>>>  * [Please fill in and correct]
>> I'd say the maybe the body that makes the decisions should have a
>> defined size. Maybe 7 or 9 members -- that's not to much (otherwise
>> nobody might feel responsible) and not to less (to much work for
>> everyone). The size of the group/team/SIG itself of course is not limited.
> 
> OK, this is where I start yelling.
> 
> We've got a release coming up, and we need to coordinate to make sure things
> get done. So a proposal is made on how to make sure the right people meet
> with the right people to get things done and organized.

As I indicated earlier in this thread multiple time already: I'm fine
with finding a rough and easy scheme for now and sorting details like...

> So, of course, it then moves to:
> - discussion of meeting times
> - naming of representatives suggestions of representatives
> - agenda for the first meeting
> - discussion of blockers
> 
> Wait, no, *all the discussion is around GROUP SIZE and MAILING LIST NAMES*?

...out after F7. Toshio just asked for comments and I gave some. Yeah,
maybe I should have kept that one out for now ;-) Sorry.

> [...]


CU
thl