Release Engineering Meeting Recap from Monday 16-APR-07
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Apr 17 12:10:50 UTC 2007
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:31:49PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
>
> On 17.04.2007 13:05, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:19:21PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >>>And it comes as no suprise since as we all should know FE was always
> >>>doing mass rebuilds until including FC6. I wonder how the 0.6% and 1%
> >>>were forgotten in the process. Perhaps someone did a rebuild with the
> >>>same EVR - we didn't catch these in the old days.
> >>We never did full rebuilds. Data-packages never had to be rebuild.
> >OK, that accounts for the 0.6-1% then. [...]
>
> Well, you carefully didn't reply to the part where I explained that you
> can't get to a proper number "how many packages weren't rebuild in the
> devel cycle FE5 -> FE6" by looking at todays repos. So the 0.6-1% are
> FUD in my eyes.
Please be careful with using the word FUD. Not everything that doesn't
suit your needs is FUD.
> I don't have hard numbers either -- but from memory I'd say we didn't
> rebuild round about 1/3 of the packages in the FE mass rebuild for FC6.
Your memory doesn't serve you well. You even asked for two mass
rebuilds for FC6, one for new rpm signing/sped up dynamic linking/new
minimal buildroots and another "semi-mass rebuild" for fixing the
gdb-backtrace bug for packages build in September. In fact all (but
1%) packages in FE6 got rebuilt at least once.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> We probably will have to do a rebuild of all (most?) packages in
> Fedora Extras before FC5 is released. Why? Some reasons:
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:25:54PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Now it makes four good reasons to build all Extras packages in devel
> before FC6.
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 07:13:16PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Yes, we did a lot of mass-rebuilds in for the last releases,
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20070417/b4e2d112/attachment.bin
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list