CLA requirements

[Rahul Sundaram]

Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On 2/21/07, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> that. Do we really need CLA for groups like bug triaging and ambassadors
>> majority of whom dont submit any content to the project?
> 
> Hello,
> Ambassadors should have cla_done. I thought we have already talked
> about this on the Fedora Ambassadors mailing list.

Ambassadors talking among themselves is irrelevant for determining this. 
This is a legal and process issue.

> Since content is the only that matter for the CLA, we must not forget
> that Fedora Ambassadors provide fedora with some slides, videos,
> pictures, marketing brochure,..... It would be wise to keep the
> current on-going situation as it is. If not, no one can track who
> signed CLA and posted what. Having a standard protocol will ease the
> overall load of man power.

On the other hand it raises the barrier. We have had repeated complaints 
from folks finding the process too difficult. Remember many of those 
people are just those who want to attend a event or two and talk about 
Fedora and things. Not developers or packagers who need to know all the 
gpg keysigning tricks

Rahul