why I'm using Ubuntu instead of Fedora ATM
Jeremy Katz
katzj at redhat.com
Wed Jan 3 15:32:57 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 10:29 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 04:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Agreed. We always point people to RHEL or CentOS and I think that
> > becomes more and more a problem, especially now that Legacy is dead.
> >
> > A Fedora LTS (two years? maybe the server parts ever three?) now and
> > then (every second or third release?) from a new Fedora Legacy (needs a
> > different name) would IMHO a nice solution.
>
> My question here is who will do the work? If you want to feed from RHEL
> updates, then you're basically only going to be doing backports, no new
> versions. You're also only going to be fixing bugs that are deemed worthy
> through the RHEL process, which usually needs a paid customer reporting the
> problem, etc, etc... They are different beasts and the work still has to be
> done to build packages, push them through a QA / update process, take bugs
> in, do QA, etc, etc, etc...
There are also (non-trivial) differences in the package set. The Fedora
universe is large... :)
Jeremy
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list