why I'm using Ubuntu instead of Fedora ATM

Luis Villa luis at tieguy.org
Wed Jan 3 17:21:29 UTC 2007


On 1/3/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> Luis Villa schrieb:
> > On 1/3/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> >> Thx Luis, I liked you mail. Some comments from my side:
> >> On 03.01.2007 09:59, Luis Villa wrote:
> >>> * QA: Ubuntu aggressively pushes people to use their development
> >>> branch and report problems, which leads to better, more stable final
> >>> releases. [...]
> >> Agreed. The biggest problem we have in this regard IMHO is that we
> >> always communicate "you can't get to stable release from rawhide or a
> >> test release". That scares people aways from the devel branch and the
> >> test releases. We should provide a clean solution so people at least can
> >> get from test3 to stable.
> > No, you should provide a clean path from every package ver X to every
> > package ver X+1. Period. [...]
>
> Actually I'd like to see this, too, but Fedora people seem to be so
> unwilling to support something like that so I tried the "better ask for
> something that's not that hard to realize and lies between the current
> solution and the best/ideal solution; maybe then the chances to get what
> we ask for are higher and it make one big part of the problem go away,
> even if parts of the problem remain"-approach ;-)

<shrug> I'm not (at least in this thread) trying to explain what
Fedora *can* do; I'm trying to state what others *are* doing and where
Fedora is falling short. Fedora may feel they can't do it for whatever
reason, but others are doing it (or at least a reasonable fascimile of
it), and seeing benefits from it, and Fedora should be aware of that.

Luis




More information about the advisory-board mailing list