how to govern and manage the new combined repository (second proposal from thl)

[Mike McGrath]

On 1/12/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info> wrote:
> Bill Nottingham schrieb:
> > Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora at leemhuis.info) said:
> >> - FESCo and the Core Cabal (f13 and notting [jeremy is a member of FESCO
> >> already]) become FTC -- Fedora Technical Committee (the final name still
> >> needs to be discussed, there are some alternatives floating around).
> > I'd suggest Fedora Distribution Committee (FEDCo?), as really, this is
> > all about the distributions we do.
>
> I'm fine with a FESDco *as long* as it's position is below the FTC
>
> > I'm open to more suggestions, but I
> > think FTC 1) has acronym collisions
>
> +1
>
> >  2) is somewhat broad (infrastructure
> > is fairly technical, after all)
>
> See my reply to mmcgrath.

In the end I guess my concern is making sure that the groups are able
to focus on their task while avoiding noise.  "Do one thing well, Play
well with others"

           -Mike