governance, fesco, board, etc.
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203 at freenet.de
Thu Jun 14 04:34:33 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 10:40 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 07:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > * Before: FE had a functional work-flow, functional simple reviews,
> > > functional bugzilla, some bureaucracy, non-functional QA.
> > > Now: koji, bodhi, flagged-reviews, broken bugzilla, more bureaucracy,
> > > still non-functional QA.
> >
> > I've seen you say this. I think I have seen other contributors agree
> > with some of those points. We're addressing them as fast as we can.
>
> And in support Ralf's point that we need to pursue releasing early and
> releasing often,
... when something is "ready" and stable enough.
> thanks to rel-eng and QA for DOING EXACTLY THAT.
... if they also apply "Fix early, fix ASAP" ...
> We can't wait for the new QA system to be perfect before we start using
> it, can we? That is the Cathedral model.
Right, but ... prematurely deploying something and ignoring
bugs/deficiencies etc. also doesn't help anybody.
Ralf
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list