Secondary ARCH

Mike McGrath mmcgrath at redhat.com
Thu Mar 8 22:28:11 UTC 2007


Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Mike McGrath (mmcgrath at redhat.com) said: 
>   
>>> I think this is a good start.  I'm a little concerned with how we ensure 
>>> that what they put up as "Fedora" stuff is actually Fedora stuff, 
>>> generated legally, securely, etc...  We haven't really had to think on 
>>> this before because we only put up what we generate, now we're going to 
>>> put up what somebody else generates from a different system.  Just 
>>> something that will keep me up at night.
>>>       
>> I'd say the same way we do it now, bugzilla.  
>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224627) for 
>> example.  We have ultimate control to remove something if we need to.
>>     
>
> I think what he's asking is do we have the resources to *review* that
> stuff is built from the same/similar sources, etc.
>
> Bill
>
>   
I hate to even suggest this but do we need some sort of super CLA?  or 
would the CLA cover this already?  Side note: I'm not sure we can host 
this immediately, we just don't have the storage right this minute.  I'm 
looking around though.

    -Mike




More information about the advisory-board mailing list