sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Thu Mar 22 02:04:10 UTC 2007
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:35:56 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> FESCo fails to define its field of activity. The moved Wiki pages for the
>>> new FESCo don't add any description,
>> The thing important for me is: it seems the pages were simply moved,
>> without asking the public or FESCo for opinions first. Yes, the topic
>> was discussed once in the public some weeks earlier (without a real
>> outcome), but now it was simply done afaics, without even discussing
>> FESCo first. Was such a hectic really necessary?
> 1) Having to search for the old Fedora Extras main page was "Very Funny"(TM).
> Apparently it's now called Fedora Packaging on the index. It's getting
> 2) The rename was incomplete in that everybody who is subscribed to the
> old page names, now has to update the Wiki preferences. E.g. presently
> I'm still subscribed to pages, which don't exist anymore because they have
> been moved somewhere.
Every single page renamed has already had redirects setup. So you dont
have to search for anything. I already send a announcement to
fedora-maintainers list about this describing what has been done explicitly.
More information about the advisory-board