Legal Update

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:33:20 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> What I understood is that is that we can't explicitly say in words
> the reason behind why we don't include certain software.  I don't
> consider the context in the workflow that I described as not allowed.
> Spot, let me know what you think.  If we need to get legal
> confirmation on the specific workflow as I suggested, let's get that
> done.

I personally feel that you're trying any way possible to get around
what Legal has said.  It's very reasonable to assume that if you
attempted to do /something/, were told that Fedora can't help you
do /something/ but if you happen to look over /here/, that we are now
putting context into what /here/ is and what /here/ provides.  This is
what Legal does not want us to do.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20071119/72bbb21f/attachment.bin