Election Data

[CLAY S]

having that be optional really hurts the value of the data for scientific
study, since there is probably a correlation between how strategic a voter
is and how likely he is to click that.

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:30, Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 13:31 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote:
> > Perhaps a good solution is to allow participants to opt in on a per-vote
> > basis: a checkbox that says "I consent to having my anonymized vote
> > published" could appear right on the vote form. (Vote data should also
> > be randomly ordered so that time-correlation is not possible).
>
> This I like best, because it's a per voter, per instance thing, rather
> than a set of voters today deciding things for sets of voters in the
> future.
>
> --
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
>
> _______________________________________________
> fedora-advisory-board mailing list
> fedora-advisory-board at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
>
>


-- 
clay shentrup
phone: 206.801.0484

"Iraq? No, YOU rock!"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20080728/b009cc02/attachment.html