One person - several FAS accounts? (was: bodhi abuse?)
Karsten 'quaid' Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Tue Sep 2 18:42:36 UTC 2008
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:36 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> If this becomes a real problem (or if it is already) we can just
> create a
> policy against this sort of thing and enforce it on a per complaint
> basis.
It sounds as if it has become a real problem. Can Infrastructure put
together a policy it can enforce? Then please let this know for a round
of sanity checking. :)
BTW, I have two accounts (kwade, quaid), with "legitimate" reasons for
having two that were not (previously?) covered by FAS capabilities. I
think I see a clear path from here for consolidation, but it may not be
for everyone. Folks will appreciate having some process and time to
sort out the how and why.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20080902/e1bff562/attachment.bin
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list