Appointment of Board Members.
seth vidal
skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Mon Aug 16 20:06:02 UTC 2010
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 01:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 12:28 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Let me reverse that question. What does Red Hat get out of employing
> >> the Fedora Project leader and having the person have veto rights over
> >> the board? What would Red Hat lose by giving up on the veto power? The
> >> benefit to losing the power is that others vendors and the volunteer
> >> community would feel more in control.
> > There are other vendors? I want to hear from representatives of those
> > other vendors.. publicly..on the record..as to their current feelings
> > with regard to lack of control.
>
> Let us assume for a moment that there are no other vendors in the entire
> Fedora community except for Red Hat. Would you want to facilitate that
> by providing a opportunity to participate in a equivalent footing?
>
equivalent footing? One org owns all the infrastructure and big amount
of the devels on @core.
It's not equivalent.
-sv
More information about the advisory-board
mailing list