Appointment of Board Members.

seth vidal skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Mon Aug 16 20:06:02 UTC 2010


On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 01:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 12:28 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> Let me reverse that question.  What does Red Hat get out of employing
> >> the Fedora Project leader and having the person have veto rights over
> >> the board? What would Red Hat lose by giving up on the veto power?  The
> >> benefit to losing the power is that others vendors and the volunteer
> >> community would feel more in control.
> > There are other vendors?  I want to hear from representatives of those
> > other vendors.. publicly..on the record..as to their current feelings
> > with regard to lack of control.
> 
> Let us assume for a moment that there are no other vendors in the entire
> Fedora community except for Red Hat.  Would you want to facilitate that
> by providing a opportunity to participate in a equivalent footing?
> 

equivalent footing? One org owns all the infrastructure and big amount
of the devels on @core.

It's not equivalent.

-sv




More information about the advisory-board mailing list