Appointment of Board Members.

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 01:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 01:37 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> >> Lose the veto power entirely and you have much less of that risk.  
> >> FESCo doesn't have a single person with a veto power and we are relying
> >> on a fully elected group and things are moving along just fine.   If the
> >> board works on a consensus model just like now but without the veto
> >> power, would things really be that different?   
> > I can think of a couple of situations where it would be.
> >
> > Remember 'The INCIDENT'?
> 
> If you are talking about the security incident, I don't think we have
> anything to be proud of. 


I wasn't saying to be proud of - just saying it would be different.

which is what you asked.

-sv