Board Composition Proposal

Jeff Spaleta jspaleta at gmail.com
Tue Aug 17 17:44:55 UTC 2010


On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm a little confused too.  I don't see anyone from FESCo saying they'd
> like to do X but haven't been allowed to because of the board.  But I'm
> not sure if that's what he's advocating or not.

I'm seeing a lot of hypothetical and very little specifics.  I'd much
prefer to have corrective action that has a kernel in responding to a
very specific problem situation, and then is abstracted out from that.
 I fear we are starting with an abstraction and then looking for
specific problem situations to shoehorn into that abstract view of how
it should work.

-jef


More information about the advisory-board mailing list