Appointment of Board Members.
mspevack at fedoraproject.org
Wed Aug 18 16:35:55 UTC 2010
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, David Nalley wrote:
>> Riffing on that a bit, I think there's an equal amount of optimizing
>> and perhaps consolidating of roles when you think about some of the
>> fuzzier parts of Fedora.
>> For instance, why can't there be one group of people that
>> collectively figures out a globally consistent way to handle budget
>> requests -- whether that is for a FUDCon, a FAD, a booth at a local
>> event, media, swag, travel funding, etc.
>> Streamline a lot of stuff, and do a better job of making sure that
>> people know the discretionary/day-to-day budget that Red Hat
>> allocates to the Fedora Project can be used by *anyone* or *any
>> group* within our community that needs a monetary investment to
>> support or help turn ideas into reality.
> Why would we create yet another group to do this? FAmSCo already
> manages around $100k worth of budget (though it's been heavily
> delegated for the past few years, with FAmSCo retaining responsibility
> but largely pushing decision making down) Tacking on Premier Fedora
> events and discretionary funds roughly doubles that, but I can't
> imagine that the structure already in place wouldn't scale to meet
> that. Moreover, that group tends to be more involved in the
> organization of premier Fedora events than any other sub-group within
> <disclaimer> I am on FAmSCo for a few more months, and have proposed
> this idea before </disclaimer>
Actually, I think we agree with each other here, David. We do have the
organization in place. I think that the suggestion isn't a
revolutionary change, but rather an acknowledged increase in scope, and
perhaps a name change to indicate that the funding pool is not only for
Ambassadors, but for all contributors.
More information about the advisory-board