Response to "Getting Fedora Out of the If-Then Loop"
jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Feb 20 17:52:12 UTC 2010
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 18:51 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> Interesting. As the KDE SIG decided (IIRC it was pointed out that we
> need that) that we do better QA for the KDE Desktop spin, i sent a
> mail to the list introduced myself and applied for the QA group in
> FAS. I still wait to get approved for QA. I dont want to say it's
> because of KDE is not part of the QA work that's going on. I just want
> to show that it's frustrating to want to do the work, already doing
> the work (as possible), but not getting applied.
You don't have to be in the QA group to do QA tasks. In fact, we
haven't come up with a good use of the group mechanics yet.
Are you failing to find information at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Join on things to work on?
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20100220/23798af5/attachment.bin
More information about the advisory-board