Planet Fedora guidelines?

[Clint Savage]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Robyn Bergeron
<robyn.bergeron at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:57 PM, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> Jeff Spaleta (jspaleta at gmail.com) said:
>>> > 2010/6/18 Máirín Duffy <duffy at fedoraproject.org>:
>>> > > Maybe adding a link to planet feeds for contact information for the
>>> > > poster would be nice. And having a note somewhere that if you take issue
>>> > > with a blog post's appropriateness for the planet, to use the private
>>> > > contact link (which maybe takes you to a FAS login page, where you login
>>> > > and then it provides the FAS public contact info for the poster) to talk
>>> > > to the person.
>>> >
>>> > Yes, I think its quite reasonable that people provide contact
>>> > information if they want to use our planet and be prepared to
>>> > participate in a discussion about their content from other
>>> > contributors if and when their content is deemed questionable by
>>> > another contributor.
>>>
>>> This could certainly be automated... after all, given how the planet works
>>> we can automatically tie entries to a FAS account, no?
>
> What are the current requirements for a fedorapeople account? Is it
> just CLA, or CLA +1? If it was CLA+1, I think that we are far more
> likely to know that the people are actual contributors.  On the other
> hand - I wonder if we know what percentage of people who are posting
> to planet are CLA vs. CLA + 1 - if we have lots of people providing
> good content who are only CLA, I think we run the risk of losing some
> of those people, which would not be excellent.
>
> Just curious - I don't know if doing that at all would be helpful,
> useful, or anything more than me randomly brainstorming bad ideas.
>
> -Robyn
>

Yes, it's CLA+1 because you have to have a fedorapeople.org account to
be on the planet and that requires CLA+1

Cheers,

Clint