Planet Fedora guidelines?

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:55:28 -0400,
  Chris Tyler <chris at tylers.info> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 11:31 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > - a FAS account aging requirement for posting rights (maybe a separate
> > planet that, if you hae a mentor, they can watch and you can graduate
> > from? For example new ambassadors could be added to an ambassadors
> > planet first..... if there is some faux paus people reading will better
> > know who the poster is and more easily know how to contact them etc)
> 
> I'm curious about this one, because CLA+1 strikes me as being better
> than an aging requirement. In what cases are new contribs getting +1
> without some form of mentorship or input from the community?

That was the only one on the list that didn't seem to be clearly a good
idea. I think this issue is better solved by having better documentation
on how to use (particularly using tagging) and what the expectations are
for Fedora Planet.

I think restricting people to a limited feed during a probationary period
is more likely to do harm by discouraging people, than prevent harm by
preventing oopses.