thinklinux.ssh at gmail.com
Mon Nov 8 15:33:21 UTC 2010
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Sandro "red" Mathys
<red at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 11/08/2010 04:14 PM, Sandro "red" Mathys wrote:
>> On 11/08/2010 04:09 PM, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Jared K.
>>> Smith<jsmith at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Christoph Wickert
>>>> <christoph.wickert at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I think we sent it to Thorsten for a reason: Nominees should not see in
>>>>> advance what the other nominees wrote. Therefor an independent person
>>>>> should collect them.
>>>> I'd be happy to collect them if nobody else steps up to volunteer.
>>> Thanks. But I am taking FAmSCo one.
>>> I have already created a page only for FAmSCo and we are adding
>>> questions there.
>> Why was creating a new page actually necessary? Why didn't you simply
>> add the questions under the title you created on the shared page?
Just to make sure the page is not too long and the questions are not lost.
>> Why do
>> ambassadors always need to do everything separated from all the others?
We are inside the wiki and linked from the election page. That's not
separate from all the others.
> ...and just copying questions to the newly created page 1:1 doesn't
> really make sense at all.
I don't want a flame war out here. I volunteered to organise
questions, and I thought that would be the best way. Page/question
arrangement is not really the issue in this voting. The issue is to
get more quality questions so that we know who are the best for the
Let's work on that, please.
More information about the advisory-board