Fedora Board Recap 2010-10-25

[Rex Dieter]

On 10/26/2010 08:26 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
>> === Remaining issues for approval of the multi desktop DVD (ticket #88) ===
>> * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Media_Handout_Requirements (kudos to Matt)
>> * If $SOMEBODY in RELENG hypothetically willing take responsibility for
>> rel-engineering of this, and if requirements are met, are we approving
>> for F14?
>> * (Jon) seems awful late to do it. Perhaps one of the criteria should be
>> timing?
>> * (Smooge) how about putting timing after this... if it's not done by
>> Alpha... it shouldn't happen
>> * (Spot) should be a schedule milestone?
>> * (Jon) we're past feature freeze, this is a feature
>> * (Mizmo) - example of changing things past alpha, makes it more
>> difficult for supporting materials on the website, docs, etc.
>> * (Spot) (1) should there be a timing requirement in these guidelines?
>> ... yes from my POV (Rex agrees)  (2) Do we give an exception in this
>> specific case as there were no guidelines in place when it was put together?
>> * (Jared) If it's built on our infrastructure, if $STRAWMAN is okay
>> helping getting it built & hosted on our infrastructure.... in this
>> specific case if they meet all requirements outside of schedule/timing,
>> then yes they can move forward.
>> * (Mizmo) added a requirement to the doc for Fedora Design Team produced
>> artwork & explicitly adding schedule requirement that will be waived for
>> this particular request.
>> * Conclusion - Jared will talk to Christoph about our decision.
> 
> Reading this summary, I can't really decipher what that overall
> decision was.  Could someone please just list a one line summary of

My own impression (others feel free to correct me), was that, in
general, if the following criteria were met,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Media_Handout_Requirements
then the board is satisified.

-- Rex