2010-09-02 MEETING PROPOSAL: discussion on Annual User Survey

Bill Nottingham notting at redhat.com
Thu Sep 2 15:38:18 UTC 2010

Robyn Bergeron (robyn.bergeron at gmail.com) said: 
> I would certainly hope that permission isn't really needed, since
> marketing has been wanting to do this for about a year, and packaging
> on limesurvey has been ongoing as part of this process. Nobody has yet
> said that I ought to go get permission from the board before we
> actually -do- it and I've pretty heavily advertised my intent.  It's
> pretty much been the "next thing on the plate" after getting fedora
> insight out the door.

With my FESCo hat on, this was referred to the board not necessarily
because we felt it needed permission, but that if for some reason it 
did (or needed resources, etc), the board's the appropriate place for
it, not FESCo.


More information about the advisory-board mailing list