Fedora 20 (yes, F20).
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Tue Sep 14 01:26:19 UTC 2010
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dunno if I'll make the meeting, so...
> Máirín Duffy (duffy at fedoraproject.org) said:
> > Think for a minute or two. What do *you* think Fedora should focus on
> > for F15 and F16? How about F17? F18? F19...or... F20? What should F20
> > look like, how should it be, who uses it.... at least, for us to have
> > succeeded towards achieving our mission as a project?
> Given our normal release schedules, that's three years down the road.
> A lot can change in computing in three years. Three years ago, there
> were no netbooks; there was no Android, and the iPhone had only been
> out for six months. Even Facebook had only been open to the public
> for a year. For those in the cloud space, KVM was less than six months
> So, asking where we want Fedora to be there requires us all to put
> on our IDC analyst hats and predict where the market is going. (Or, it
> requires us to state we don't care what other people use, we're going
> to do our own thing. Which is a valid choice, although I'm not sure
> it's an interesting one of we're attempting to spread free software,
> content, culture, etc.)
> In the past three years, the biggest trends in the basic computing space
> are miniturization, mobilization, and the disappearance of the local
> app. More and more the basic user activities are done on a mobile
> device (whether laptop, pad, or phone), via wireless networking (whether
> wifi or 3G), to some sort of online service. Furthermore, these mobile
> devices are taking the place of more special-purpose devices in
> the low-end consumer space; the standalone media player, the standalone
> navigation unit, even the standalone camera are all being merged
> into a single device.
> This leaves Fedora in an interesting bind... if we're targeting this
> sort of user, we're targeting a shrinking market. The traditional desktop
> with local user apps appears to be dying pretty quickly. The devices
> that are getting used more for these tasks have OSes pretty well tied
> to the hardware by the manufacturer... I suppose targetting people who
> want to replace the OS on their tablet PC is akin to where the 'desktop'
> in Linux was targeted 10 years ago, but is that a market that grows? Will
> it matter? To properly attack this market, we may need to reorient
> around something like the proposed GNOME OS. Howver, with Android, and iOS,
> and Meego, this is a tightly competitive space.
> There are still usage cases and markets where the mobile computing
> devices don't have much of a strangehold. No one's developing for Android
> *on* Android, as far as I can tell. High scale digital content editing
> isn't done too much on mobile, I believe. So, Fedora could be targetting
> the developer (corporate or otherwise), the content creator, and so on.
> The advantage here is that these people are likely already technical.
> However, you're also making the bet that these usage cases aren't going
> to move more to the mobile/cloud space, which may be a losing bet. (I
> suspect someone's working on the equivalent of Google Apps for coding
> as we speak - edit online, get your own SCM automatically, one-click
> deployment to a cloud server, all without any infrastructure of your own.)
> On the server side, it's all about virtualization; in many respects, you
> have the same server that you had three years ago, it's just more about how
> they're deployed, and the services you run may be a bit different. While
> Fedora could concentrate in this space, it's obviously where RHEL has
> the largest foothold, and where RHEL will find the largest deployments.
> It's hard for Fedora to push a cultural shift here as it will likely be
> seen (right or wrong) as a beta for RHEL in this space.
> So, yeah, I'm not sure there's a silver bullet of what I'd want to see
> here. Fedora could concentrate on being a server base, which has a use,
> but not one that has a lot of growth, and will constantly but up against
> its big brother. It could concentrate on the mobile/tablet/etc. space,
> but that's a big shift. Or it could concentrate on the developer/content
> creator space, which is a small market that I suspect the mobile market
> is going to eat up eventually.
> There aren't any easy answers, unfortunately.
IMO, I think the only answer is rich, integrated online apps. Those
iPhone users, android users, etc. I don't know why they couldn't also be
I've said it before, I don't see any possibility where Linux (much less
Fedora) will conquer the consumer desktop. Working towards it is working
towards a goal that most other companies have already left behind.
Mobile market is already in good competition, lets leave them be.
I think what we need is free alternatives to what google offers. That
doesn't mean we have to host all this stuff. I'm thinking that instead of
major hosting giants like google, we give companies the ability to run
their own google. This aligns well with what Red Hat is doing (allowing
people to run their own cloud). So lets give them some nice boxed apps
that run on the cloud.
Mobile users can use them. Desktop users can use them. Enterprise
customers can have the assurance that their data is being kept private,
while not having to sacrifice features. This is a major shift from what
we're doing now. It'd require development from teams that don't exist
today. To me though, the alternative is Fedora not mattering much at all.
More information about the advisory-board