Fedora Board Recap 2011-02-21

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:00:11AM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Montag, den 21.02.2011, 17:29 -0500 schrieb Jon Stanley:
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Maybe I'm misreading this, but this seems like it would be more simply
> > > stated as "the wallpaper used on spins is determined by the Design Team".
> > 
> > They have that authority, yes. In this particular instance, if the
> > Design Team proves to be unwilling or unable to render a decision, it
> > will be kicked up to the Board. 
> 
> IIRC at FUDCon we agreed that  the spins SIG and the spin maintainers
> should have a stronger mandate, right? And now it's on the design-team
> or the board to decide about the wallpapers of individual spins?
> 
> Don't get me wrong: I would like us to use a common artwork to
> strengthen the Fedora brand, but in the end it should IMHO be up to the
> maintainers. I mean, if I am not mistaken the GNOME upstream wallpaper
> will be used anyway in the desktop spin, right?
>
ATM, the design team is in charge of deciding what wallpaper will be used on
the desktop spin.  This status update was given by jsmith (I think) on
behalf of the design team about the status of the wallpaper for that spin.

I'm not sure how that influences the rest of your post.

-Toshio

> So is the desktop SIG to
> decide but others are not? Or what about the GTK+ or window manager
> theme?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/attachments/20110221/583e308e/attachment-0001.bin