Proposed governance documents

[Rex Dieter]

On 02/22/2011 03:24 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Going through the governance documents which are generally sound except
> for this part [1].
>
> * Appoint or remove members of itself
> * Chooses its own method of adding and removing members
>
> This has the potential affect to be misused and effectively takes any
> kind of community involvement out of the picture.

Do realize that this document, in general, is more about trying to 
define and characterize the status quo.  And, to my own thinking, that 
statement is fairly accurate.  Do you disagree?

Further, I'd suggest that if you don't like this particular item as 
worded, please do provide constructive suggestions on how to make it better.

-- rex